Inteligência artificial e humanismo de fraternidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29386/reb.v84i328.5527Resumo
Este artigo apresenta algumas “fascinantes oportunidades e [alguns] graves riscos” da inteligência artificial (IA) à luz do recente magistério do Papa Francisco. Não é uma tarefa fácil, pois o temo “inteligência artificial” se refere a uma “galáxia de realidades” e não há uma definição unívoca dela. Recentemente, com a IA criativa (1ª parte) houve um salto qualitativo. Seus desafios devem ser abordados a nível legislativo e ético (2ª parte). Mais concretamente, o Papa insta a adotar um humanismo de fraternidade inspirado em Francisco de Assis (3ª parte).
Abstract: This article presents some of the “exciting opportunities and grave risks” of artificial intelligence (AI) in light of the recent magisterium of Pope Francis. This is not an easy task, as the term “artificial intelligence” refers to a “galaxy of different realities” and there is not a single definition of it. Recently there has been a qualitive leap with generative AI (1st part). Its challenges must be addressed at the legislative and ethical levels (2nd part). More specifically, the Pope urges the adoption of a humanism of fraternity inspired by Francis of Assisi (3rd part).
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; Pope Francis; Franciscanism; Ethics.
Downloads
Referências
ABNEY, K.; JENKINS, R.; LIN, P. (ed.). Robot ethics 2.0. From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
AGRAWAL, A.; GANS J.; GOLDFARB, A. Prediction Machines. The simple economics of Artificial Intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2022.
ARISTÓTELES, Ética Nicomaquea. Buenos Aires: Colihue, 2007.
BAUDRILLARD, J. Il delitto perfetto. La televisione ha ucciso la realtà? Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1996.
BENGIO, Y. Learning deep architectures for AI. Hanover (Mass): Now Foundations and Trends, 2009.
BILTON, N. Artificial Intelligence as a Threat, New York Times, Sec. E., p. 2, 6.11.2014.
BLIX, H. A farewell to wars. The growing restraints on the interstate use of force. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press, 2023.
BONNEFON, J.-F.; RAHWAN, L.; SHARIFF, A. Whose life should your car save?. New York Times, Sec. SR, p. 9, 6.11.2016.
BRAGA, M.L.S. (ed.) Inteligência artificial & redes sociais. São Paulo: EDUC, 2019.
BROOKS, P. La comunicazione della fede nell’età dei media elettronici. Leumann: ElleDiCi, 1987.
BUELL, E.H.; SIGELMAN, L. Attack Politics: Negativity in Presidential Campaigns Since 1960. 2. ed. Lawrence, University Press of Kansas 2009.
CELLAN-JONES, R. Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind [2.12.2015]. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540. Acesso em: 6 fev. 2024.
CONCÍLIO VATICANO II, Gaudium et spes. Constituição pastoral [7.12.1965], AAS, v. 58, p. 1025-1120, 1966.
CONCÍLIO VATICANO II, Inter mirifica. Decreto [4.12.1963], AAS, v. 56, p. 145-157, 1964.
CRAMER, M. A.I. Drone May Have Acted on Its Own in Attack in Libya. New York Times, Sec. A, p. 8, 4.06.2021.
CRONIN, A.K. Power to the People: How Open Technological Innovation is Arming Tomorrow’s Terrorists. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
DAVIES, H.; MCKERNAN, B.; SABBAGH, D. “The Gospel”: how Israel uses AI to select bombing targets in Gaza [1.12.2023]. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/01/the-gospel-how-israel-uses-ai-to-select-bombing-targets. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2024.
DAVIS, C.R.; SQUIRE, P. Air force colonel backtracks over his warning about how AI could go rogue and kill its human operators [3.06.2023]. Disponível em: https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-powered-drone-tried-killing-its-operator-in-military-simulation-2023-6?r=US&IR=T. Acesso em: 06 fev. 2024.
DAVIS, E.V.W. Shadow warfare. Cyberwar policy in the United States, Russia, and China. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021.
D’OLIMPIO, L. The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five? [3.06.2016]. Disponível em: https://theconversation.com/the-trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-to-save-five-57111. Acesso em: 06 fev. 2024.
EASA, K. Mans Relationships with Technology An Analysis of Marshall McLuhan’s “Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man”. Ebook. München: Grin, 2019.
EUBANKS, V. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police and punish the Poor. New York: St Martin’s Press, 2018.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI [8.04.2019]. Disponível em: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai. Acesso em: 06 fev. 2024.
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. European Parliament resolution of 12 September 2018 on autonomous weapon systems. Disponível em: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0341_EN.html. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2024.
FISHER, M. The Chaos Machine: The inside story of how Social Media rewired our minds and our world. London: Quercus, 2023.
FLORIDI, L. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
FLORIDI, L.; TADDEO, M. How AI can be a force for Good. Science, v. 361, n. 6404, p. 751-752, 2018.
FRANCISCO, Papa. Discurso aos membros do corpo diplomático acreditado junto da Santa Sé [11.01.2016], L’Osservatore Romano, n. 7, p. 4-5, 11/12.01.2016.
FRANCISCO, Papa. Fratelli tutti. Carta encíclica [3.10.2020], AAS, v. 112, p. 969,1074, 2020.
FRANCISCO, Papa. Laudato si’. Carta encíclica [24.05.2015], AAS, v. 107, p. 847-945, 2015.
FRANCISCO, Papa. Mensagem para o 57º Dia Mundial da Paz [1.01.2024a], L’Osservatore Romano, n. 286, p. 2-3, 14.12.2023.
FRANCISCO, Papa. Mensagem para o 58º Dia Mundial das Comunicações Sociais [24.01.2024b], L’Osservatore Romano, n. 19, p. 8, 24.01.2024.
FREY, C.B.; OSBORNE, M.A. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, n. 114, p. 254-280, 2017.
GACOVSKI, Z. Natural Language processing. Burlington (ON): Arcler Press, 2021.
GAGGI, M. Le falsità intelligenti che minacciano il mondo. Corriere.it [12.10.2023]. Disponível em: https://www.corriere.it/opinioni/23_ottobre_12/falsita-intelligenti-che-minacciano-mondo-5bd02be6-6927-11ee-9c9c-ce3429611a2d.shtML. Acesso em: 06 fev. 2024.
GISOTTI, A. Entrevista a Benanti: La inteligencia artificial al servicio del bien común. Vatican News [12.12.2023]. Disponível em: https://www.vaticannews.va/es/mundo/news/2023-12/benanti-la-inteligencia-artificial-al-servicio-del-bien-comun.htML. Acesso em: 06 fev. 2024.
GONÇALVEZ, N. da S. Intelligenze artificiali e intelligenze incarnate: quale frontiera? Intervista a Paolo Benanti. La Civiltà Cattolica, v. 4, n. 4164, p. 572-586, 16.12.2023.
GONZÁLEZ B.A. Paradigmas económicos y desarrollo sostenible. La economía al servicio de la conservación. San José: Euned, 2002.
GRÄF, E.; OTTO, P. 3th1cs. A reinvention of ethics in the digital age? Berlin: iRights media, 2017.
HARTLEY, D.S.; JOBSON, K.O. Cognitive superiority. Information to Power. Cham: Springer, 2021.
HOLMSTRÖM, J. From AI to digital transformation: The AI readiness framework. Business Horizons v. 65, n. 3, p. 329-339, 2022.
JAMIESON, K.H. Cyberwar. How Russian hackers and trolls helped elect a president. What we don’t, can’t, and do know. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
JOÃO PAULO II, Papa. Il Rapido Sviluppo. Carta apostólica [24.01.2005], AAS, v. 97, 265-274, 2005.
JOÃO PAULO II, Papa. Redemptoris misio. Carta encíclica [7.12.1990], AAS, v. 83, p. 249-340, 1991.
JOHNSEN, M. The future of Artificial intelligence in digital marketing. The next big technological break. s/l [US]: CreateSpace, 2021.
JURKOVIC, I. Statement to the 2017 group of Governmental experts on LAWS [Geneva 13.11.2017]. Disponível em: https://nuntiusge.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/20171113.pdf. Acesso em: 06 fev. 2024.
LAMBERT, D. Autonomous weapons and cyberconflicts. How Christian ethics can deal with war’s new face?. Angelicum, v. 97, n. 1, p. 93-105, 2020.
LEE, K.-F.; ROY É. I.A. la plus grande mutation de l’histoire: Qui dominera l’I.A. dominera le monde. Paris: J’ai lu, 2021.
LESSEM, R.; SCHIEFFER, A. Integral Development: Realising the Transformative Potential of Individuals, Organisations and Societies. London: Routledge, 2014.
LIN, P. O dilema étia dos carros autodirigíveis [8.12.2015]. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixIoDYVfKA0&t=8s [em inglês]. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2024.
LYNCH, J. El perfume de los limones. Tecnología y relaciones humanas en la era de Facebook. Bogotá: San Pablo, 2013.
MARKOFF, J. Should Your Driverless Car Hit a Pedestrian if It Would Save Your Life? New Yor Times, Sec. B, p. 2, 24.06.2016.
METZ, C.; SCHMIDT, G. Tech leaders urge a pause in A.I., citing “pro¬found risks to Society”. New York Times, Sec. 5, p. 5, 30.03.2023.
MILLAR, J. Ethics settings for autonomous vehicles. In: LIN, P.; JEN¬KINS, R.; ABNEY, K. (ed.). Robot ethics 2.0. From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. p. 20-34.
MOKYR, J. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
MORAVEC, H. Mind children. The future of robot and human intelli¬gence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.
MUMFORD, L. Authoritarian and Democratic Technics. Technology and Culture, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-8, 1964.
MUTZ, D.C. In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. eBook. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.
NILS, N.J. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
NORVING, P.; RUSSELL S.J. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 3. ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall, 2010.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DE¬VELOPMENT. Recommendation of the Council on AI [22.05.2019]. Disponível em: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OE¬CD-LEGAL-0449. Acesso em: 6 fev. 2024.
ORWELL. G. 1984. New York: Signet Book, 1953.
PAGLIA, V. PECORARO, R. (ed.). Robo-Ethics. Humans, machines and health. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy for Life, 2020.
PAGLIA, V.; PECORARO, R. (ed.). The “good” algorithm? Artificial in¬telligence: ethics, law, health. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy for Life, 2021.
PARISER, E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press, 2011.
PATSCH, F. L’Intelligenza artificiale generative e il nostro futuro. Una urgente necessità di regolamentazione. La Civiltà Cattolica, v. 4, n. 4162, p. 313-325, 2023.
PAULAUSKAS, K. Why cognitive superiority is an imperative. NATO Review [6.02.2024]. Disponível em: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/ articles/2024/02/06/why-cognitive-superiority-is-an-imperative/index. html. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2024.
PAULO VI, Papa. Evangelii nuntiandi. Exortação apostólica [8.12.1975], AAS, v. 58, p. 5-76, 1976.
PAULO VI, Papa. Populorum progressio. Carta encíclica [26.03.1967], AAS, v. 59, p. 257-299, 1967.
PONTIFICIO CONSELHO PARA OS MEIOS DE COMUNIAÇÃO SOCIAL. Communio et Progressio. Instrução pastoral [23.05.1971], AAS, v. 63, 593-656, 1971.
PONTIFICIO CONSELHO PARA OS MEIOS DE COMUNIAÇÃO SOCIAL. Ética nas Comunicações Sociais [4.06.2000], L’Osservatore Romano, Suplemento inserto de tabloide, p. I-IV, 31.05.2000.
PONTIFICIO CONSELHO PARA OS MEIOS DE COMUNIAÇÃO SOCIAL. Llamada a los religiosos y religiosas de vida contemplativa [3.06.1973]. Disponível em: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/pccs/documents/rc_pc_pccs_doc_03061973_contemplative-religious_sp.html. Acesso em: 6 fev. 2024.
RENALSSANE FOUNDATION. AI ethics: an Abrahamic commitment to the Rome call [10.01.2023]. Disponível em: https://www.romecall.org/ai-ethics-an-abrahamic-commitment-to-the-rome-call-2/. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2024.
RIFKIN. J. The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
ROOSE. K. My A.I. Homewrecker Has Turned Into an A.I. Office Drudge. New York Times, Sec. A, p. 1, 15.02.2024.
SCHNEIER, B. Click Here to Kill Everybody: Security and Survival in a Hyper-connected World. New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 2019.
SCHOENI, D.; VESTNER, T. Ethical Dilemmas in the Global Defense Industry. New York: Oxford University Press, 2023.
SCHUMACHER E.F., Small is beautiful die Rückkehr zum menschlichen Mass, Oekom, München 2013.
SCHWAB. K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business, 2017.
STEHR, N. Understanding society and Knowledge. Northampton (Mass): Edward Elgar, 2023.
TEGMARK, M. Vita 3.0. Essere umani nell’era dell’intelligenza artificiale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2017.
TEIXEIRA, C.M. (Org.). Fontes Franciscana e Clarianas, 4. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; FFB, 2023.
TUFEKCI, Z. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.
VARA, V. One Year In and ChatGPT Already Has Us Doing Its Bidding. New York Times, Sec. SR, p. 5, 31.12.2023.
VILMER, J.-B.J. Terminator ethics: Should we ban ‘killer robots’? In: GRÄF, E.; OTTO, P. 3th1cs. A reinvention of ethics in the digital age? Berlin: Irights Media, 2017. p. 98-113.
WAGSTAFF, J. Un nuevo modelo de ejército [--.12.2023]. Disponível em: https://www.imf.org/es/Publications/fandd/issues/2023/12/Case-Studies-New-model-army-Jeremy-Wagstaff. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2024.
WINNER, L. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, v. 109, n. 01, p. 121-136, 01.01.1980. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2024.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Revista Eclesiástica Brasileira
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Os autores cedem os direitos autorais; como gratificação, a REB oferece dois exemplares ao Autor de um artigo.
A REB adere à licença não comercial (Creative Commons). Portanto, é permitida cópia, distribuição e exibição dos textos, respeitados os direitos autorais e citada a fonte de sua proveniência.
